Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:51:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] rp |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes it does. > > > > Teucer- if you think my nonplayerhood Is certain, I am not a pep. > > I'm certain, but the fact that others disagree without being retarded > monkeys means that it is at least a little bit ambiguous. I'm certain as well, but teucer's eloquent defense of ehird's PEPhood is relatively convincing. I also don't plan to submit a proper RP, and teucer has already submitted the null RP, so: Just in case someone holds that ehird is not a PEP, I volunteer (as a more definite PEP) to submit the final version of whatever RP ehird wants to draft. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss