Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:51:26 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] rp


On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes it does.
> >
> > Teucer- if you think my nonplayerhood Is certain, I am not a pep.
>
> I'm certain, but the fact that others disagree without being retarded
> monkeys means that it is at least a little bit ambiguous.


I'm certain as well, but teucer's eloquent defense of ehird's PEPhood is
relatively convincing.

I also don't plan to submit a proper RP, and teucer has already submitted
the null RP, so:

Just in case someone holds that ehird is not a PEP, I volunteer (as a more
definite PEP) to submit the final version of whatever RP ehird wants to
draft.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss