Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

0x44 on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:27:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:25:25 -0600
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650901011522p75da28f9w21bacac5fe56de0e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812311526y2983f8a8i69bff80bca335064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901011211y14a6513fyf2fa1104abe78641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495D37C4.9000507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650901011522p75da28f9w21bacac5fe56de0e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Jamie Dallaire wrote:

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 4:38 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I claim this answer to be Consistent, though I worry about the
ramifications.



Which answer? I believe there are more than one in this thread, + no quoted
text.

Also, nttpf.

BP

Specifically the Game Actions to the public forum question.

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread