| Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:05:08 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187 |
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1 Jan 2009, at 20:01, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > I claim the Answer to be INCONSISTENT. If neither YES nor NO is >> appropriate, >> there is always PARADOX. >> > > I believe Consistent count = Inconsistent count ...Worrying. Anyone want to > help not break the game? "A Jiffy after the Answer has been submitted the Oracle shall tally any such Claims. If there exist more Claims of Inconsistency than claims of Consistency, the consultation ceases to be Answered and becomes Waiting." A tie just results in Ponderation, not game breakage. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss