Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

comex wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 31 Dec 2008, at 21:05, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>>> We need to learn our lesson and define that when we make new game objects
>>> (or explicitly make old things into game objects)...
>>>
>>> This comes up every few months in a slightly different form.
>> Welp, I think the ownership consultation is PARADOX. :)
> 
> We need a Rule 1586.

Possibly, but what's more directly relevant to this case is this
clause from Rule 2162:

      If an instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a
      possible value, it comes to have its default value.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss