Re: [s-d] [s-b] What the fuck.

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 22:59 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Charles Schaefer
> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 2008/12/29, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Elliott Hird
> >> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > BTW having half of the active players on your side isn't a scam.
> >>
> >> So, who wants to get in on a nonscam whereby half the active players
> >> vote for something via proposal?
> >>
> >> - teucer
> >
> >
> > How about the non-scam players vote themselves a "Win by Majority"?
> 
> I submit the following proposal (if the Cabal doesn't just delete it
> with their RP, which they can't do if comex is right about the Pause
> being 8, which I think e is):
> 
> {To the end of rule 5E47, append the following text:
> 
> Win By Majority
> Trigger: One or more players are not and never have been named by any
> of the strings J, Murphy, ais523, 0x44, or Billy Pilgrim.
> Victors: All players who have never had one of the aforementioned
> strings as their names.
> Prize: A Medallion of Majoritarianism
> Cleanup: The section of this rule labeled "Win By Majority" is removed.}
> 
> I will amend this proposal upon hearing evidence that I have the list
> of Cabalists wrong.

You do indeed have the list wrong, as you know full well.

As for the whole secret ruleset thing, I was against the idea of a
semipermanent dictatorship; Mao could be very interesting, but being
able to do other things with it would just be unfair.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss