0x44 on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:01:29 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] What the fuck. 

Craig Daniel wrote:

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

2008/12/29, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

BTW having half of the active players on your side isn't a scam.

So, who wants to get in on a nonscam whereby half the active players
vote for something via proposal?

- teucer

How about the non-scam players vote themselves a "Win by Majority"?


I submit the following proposal (if the Cabal doesn't just delete it
with their RP, which they can't do if comex is right about the Pause
being 8, which I think e is):

{To the end of rule 5E47, append the following text:

Win By Majority
Trigger: One or more players are not and never have been named by any
of the strings J, Murphy, ais523, 0x44, or Billy Pilgrim.
Technically, 0x44 isn't a string, but it's the closest representation I can get in this lossy medium. ;) 

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss