Alex Smith on Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:21:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject) |
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 20:18 -0500, comex wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In that case, you broke the rules by being made party to the contract > > without your explicit consent. > > No, I broke the rules by making you party to the contract without your > explicit consent. Want to call a Consultation claiming so? > > Anyway, if anyone wants this to counter the Scam effectively, we need > a Consultation called and answered ASAP, lest we run into 5E0's > "unclear, uncertain, or ambiguous" clause. It can't be Pondered ASAP, we're in Emergency. And we're all still PEPs, if not Players. (Besides, you probably deregistered the MoQ. No real chance of an assignment then...) -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss