Ed Murphy on Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:34:06 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Nkep |
James Baxter wrote: >> From: ais523@xxxxxxxxxx >> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:59:05 +0000 >> Subject: [s-b] Nkep >> >> I intend, without objection, to >> nkeplwgplxgioyzjvtxjnncsqscvntlbdqromyeyvlhkjgteaqnneqgujjpwcbyfrpueoydjjk. >> -- >> ais523 > > I object. > > I submit the following consultation with ais523 as Unbeliever: > > Is the above quoted message spam? > > Reasoning: In the message ais523 intends to take a Game Action without objection but the Game Action is incomprehensible so the message has no point and must therefore be spam. FYI, this particular string of gibberish (hereafter "nkep") dates back to some contract scam attempts in Agora last year, see e.g. http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1819 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss