Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ

Warrigal on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:49:31 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
From: Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:49:24 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=gmm9ZFqc5DavwKOcUaKVm31yNqWC2ab50hKk4AnsvAE=; b=p1aDi3pBTS62w/gTNfkBlRPEZPzYuR3oyo4h+ndAzrsQnuWQ/jBJ1xkX21KvKPTUzp XxNpabGbguae2EEEvJYiR6UZs4ucVwEnalTJmIWX7Cb3BKq4CfzIxokgJl9Q3G6aoJx5 w335/Oglcjn6S69X4C4suEIjrde6tKrjDd8qo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RHeJk16V600qtaSAf9mec3M6/pvsNtPP5vLL9rKHTZ4K9ypvcjZCf1UNag9wV8yH5d yEpWuUHoqzp+ur65d74jL591Xqwzo185mKo/W+7hYBBhsOvD4yfWCzTEiM0yS364uyT5 bZVBnW8xJO7a7r1um6cd5OXnwCu3bdTe5yY9g=
In-reply-to: <C73FF22B-20BB-4111-9223-C16A50C8EAE7@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <0ECB3903-0D85-48ED-8B50-1AAA7F41A14F@xxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20812250752j3a8ef385h7631c97cce9650db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56CCC8B9-0B12-4A71-B4A6-1ADDE1439754@xxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20812251038q3ee8bd84k924bdedab6500e9f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C73FF22B-20BB-4111-9223-C16A50C8EAE7@xxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25 Dec 2008, at 18:38, Warrigal wrote:
>> Many-word campaign speech PS response: You can't lose the Ordained
>> property for just one Consultation.
>
> Someone has to take the Consultations. If it's too much work, you
> shouldn't get to judge the nice ones too.

And someone will take the Consultations. If everyone thinks it's too
much work and dibses out, it'll get assigned to someone, probably
someone who's dibsed out of lots of other proposals. If someone thinks
it's not too much work, it'll get assigned to them.

It's not unfair to treat everyone equally in such a way that
everything that needs to get done gets done.

--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
  - From: Warrigal
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread