Roger Hicks on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:28:06 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for Nweek/152 |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 21:56, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 22:12, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> 0555 Grid Competition (BobTHJ) {{ AGAINST }} >>> The above does not provide a viable conquering mechanism. >> >> It doesn't? care to elaborate? >> >> BobTHJ > Hm. Would the bit saying "The Laws may not impede a player's ability > to change the priority list" stop the Laws from saying "XYZ players > may not enter"? That's what I was thinking about. If I were the Priest dealing with a consultation on this issue I would say that laws which discriminate and overly restrict entry to their squares are in fact impeding a player's ability to change the priority list. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss