Roger Hicks on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:28:06 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for Nweek/152


On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 21:56, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 22:12, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 0555  Grid Competition  (BobTHJ) {{ AGAINST }}
>>> The above does not provide a viable conquering mechanism.
>>
>> It doesn't? care to elaborate?
>>
>> BobTHJ
> Hm. Would the bit saying "The Laws may not impede a player's ability
> to change the priority list" stop the Laws from saying "XYZ players
> may not enter"? That's what I was thinking about.

If I were the Priest dealing with a consultation on this issue I would
say that laws which discriminate and overly restrict entry to their
squares are in fact impeding a player's ability to change the priority
list.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss