|
Craig Daniel on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:06:31 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] teucer's votes
- From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:06:25 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=Enp/FtgGHyxBpno0cHznkJ6BaLTIX/OXPe3rJGIn4qo=; b=qIHrO6spLnJ18O4zai06O4o4gJxYpAi9VaN+pDI8JMnQOFkjyU6P0vLIAdfFqaMnNX lnq0P8Pi4y7yfy4dCDbY12WT4axbh9yfIHZzTnG5XY39VoEBHCQZRCDQIw2gEHT6vDYZ bp4+TWU9M/z7RsDgt7weJMPEN8/UCheinU+Mo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=FF8S9bsxFzm5XV/Gkc3/B7I1J50fWdMlJD6pj9TjcG/zCOZSUfslcTdGDRg6kEubWo IV2UfFojEvJPH/MGuPSdM9Vs9SSfs4T9SKnVqjPCnw8vKXmed1UpkrXXPPjTqBcZZAJC lroCHppsyS9tV/sY3kkDIQfhyac465jqU6PqU=
- In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812221956u55bdcd08ie5bb09f37634a7e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44e5a2650812221956u55bdcd08ie5bb09f37634a7e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> are they valid? Consultation 163, recently pondered, includes reasoning that
> pins teucer's macks at m15. Did that change since that was answered/is part
> of the reasoning wrong, or is teucer a bum?
The reasoning is wrong, because the reasoning supposes that I managed
to somehow buy a rapier with less than m75.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss