|
Sgeo on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:44:55 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Relics
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Relics
- From: Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:44:49 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ufNU0ep3LVlV6Xnzf8iBWZqam0zMhP13I4YBk7FDRgE=; b=H0ENVstXN0eZVd1m1G9YbbSBueW658pkmQwRHMfRgBdO1DnZHj7hVTyCv8k3CBa2/N lTUQwssfN+Kmw0rtuWEcfUzracG5pA+eAxNe3P34bs8e1OMfVmIGQhlJlKGvP/5S3Nlk kWdWfO3JQBaaq9cXmYB99gynlDZZCtKHYbgt8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=HsLzJsN2A97+yVuQgiihuCuvX0GV4P8hNuQKQ2+BoC3f3vvpXXN7T8ilQaxtoa49S9 xw++On8pRcu4Knu0MWK0OJdqLQ4DqLmtP4tARgcFStw9b9hMVdtigw6nCcHlWfpenkSl OOMhVg3N/N9FJ6l6fMVl6xrzdML3wtzasJYZg=
- In-reply-to: <44e5a2650812161912g4cb12f39i75a8568a8fdf7365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44e5a2650812161912g4cb12f39i75a8568a8fdf7365@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Relics are Resident in exactly one Square of the Grid. When a Player becomes
> Resident on a Square in which any Relic is also Resident, he becomes the
> Owner of that Relic. When a Relic's Owner moves to a different Square, the
> Relic also moves to the same Square. When a Relic's Owner becomes Dead, the
> Relic becomes Unowned.
So an owned relic can be stolen by someone moving onto the same Square
as the owner. Is that intentional?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss