| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:07:37 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: The Oracle is Wise |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Jamie Dallaire > <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > are eligible for selection as Priests. It is a violation of the Rules for > > the Oracle to deliberately select a specific Priest for the purposes of > > fostering or protecting the Oracle's personal interests, monetary or > > otherwise > > You intend to enforce this how? > Exactly the same way we'd enforce any other violation of the rules by the oracle... (which is potentially a lot of ways. Recall em then call a consultation on eir guilt (hint hint vote for that proposal of mine). Beat em out in an election then call that consultation. Or just call that consultation then declare the answers of eir co-conspirators to be inconsistent.) Seriously, it's no harder to enforce that than to enforce any other rule that applies to the oracle like it applies to everyone else (e.g. if I spammed the list, or turned on the clock, or didn't fulfill my obligations, etc.) The MoQ has some power to try and circumvent the rule, but e's not above the law. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss