| Sgeo on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:49:12 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Refactor vote tallies (again) |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15/12/2008, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Jamie Dallaire >> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Jamie Dallaire >>>> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > argh. so... what's a "registered voter"? It's never mentioned anywhere >>>> else >>>> > in the rules. Nothing says it's the same thing as being eligible... >>>> >>>> I become paranoid. >>> >>> >>> Anyone still have a Tweak that can fix this instead? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spoon-discuss mailing list >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >>> >> I do. Give me the text of the needed Tweak, otherwise it will be >> "replace all instances of 'Registered' in the ruleset with 'eligible'" > > > ...you realist that's Terrible? How so? The only instances of "Registered" in the ruleset are in that rule. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss