Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments

Jay Campbell on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:12:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:12:05 -0800
In-reply-to: <49446B1D.2030902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650812131627o4b9f27amdee65604276e22f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812131642o1250ede4yf3871ffe985ee601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49446B1D.2030902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Jay Campbell wrote:


I answer Yes. (An answer of No would put us back in Era 4 or earlier.)


Dangit, nevermind.

Priest but not assigned Priest J
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Priest Assignments for C. 155-160 TEST
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: The Oracle is Wise
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread