Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention

Warrigal on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:14:45 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
From: Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:14:28 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=CgK7B493vAoEP97xDffxn69BtZMmWvIijZ/Kxn3mvUg=; b=LKEsCkF+SVOmX0goMpoOZJuVN5DxXl5oJ4lZ67uDBgNj7XFjiA2vBzW6aoFV8LJ9Qy TRCkgGVORd7j0l2Iuc4PfF/p8+b4MNAHeQubep6qxgPYGvOxKrmaGP8g9MxkYyFTi8Y3 NPELNHHA6GEHmUX2l/c4Rc3FYewUj64cn0aMs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=bApbY3NN3K0Qx99yEqS4hHzXgmddak1vtQTB7VbyeOD1vZIxnkUkzP9KoET9p5oLrU BQkgcRlwiFrWwj4KhOe9VNavJNNVy6T9qdKtFCCbHwydN6xjWXc7ZWx69R0QCyqZzjb5 TE80EFZqyWaxxWoKh7HLrM1O30AAbGYEw/sqg=
In-reply-to: <494307C6.3060203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7db5cba20812121546g1aae526fl28555d1f529a2c6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280812121638o402ae575mbf9656c8592ba49c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20812121646g29639eqdd20147a84cbb707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <494307C6.3060203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the message below as the Reasoning of the Consultation { Is
> Warrigal a stinker? }
>
> Warrigal wrote:
>> Now I nominate myself for every Ministry. I accept all my nominations,
>> specifying a Wanted Reward of m90.

Making a trade offer never makes one a stinker, unless it's
monopolistic or something.

--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: [s-d] btw
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
Previous by thread: [s-d] btw
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ordention
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread