Re: [s-d] [s-b] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal

Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:31:57 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:31:51 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=HhIDDaeqeo8jaK3KBwqk2yi5SYDCwa3q0H443RTJdKc=; b=DST5KXHA1rQvHcALSOmFu4DknNEIHLAjJYOflMSSvT9quvpRfHwoQvygXNsXAbuPTL wskSt4oFuGOFY7qycUwOLPMIv3ht01N7WOP623VH2HiYxB687kk7/tYxPrlGY+Qi/P9t 0x4aDNy2myofolyAGnwrBmwO/ejhuR+FWaJZ8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=RPFsZhSmKcb6gm8/2tGjuMVl9gUeEKgygOJyKI9vyZmwOFZnGsx8J3k7ewl72O+bKn CDCFACmSUH8dPfbyehELY4StG1zjfeyYFIjCsVuj018DPcBsa13kpWvr/PFPZqDPYIJF OPlIvia/5KZacgR4hHNy0Wc3JG+0If9/mubgc=
In-reply-to: <50b58cbd0812111225n774cec44ya78514402b27d35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6bf32280812111157x2a7f9123o55be0eb59c94c63e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <818FE456-1CE0-44FA-B700-5065BBBB1089@xxxxxxxxx> <494176FD.1010300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50b58cbd0812111225n774cec44ya78514402b27d35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Can we PLEASE use a Tweak instead of YET ANOTHER LENGTHY EMERGENCY?

Yeah, please. Emergencies are getting to be really really long.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Sgeo

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If 80% of B doesn't want an emergency, too bad
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Being annoying
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] not-Law's notes on ais523's Refresh Proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If 80% of B doesn't want an emergency, too bad
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread