Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again

Ed Murphy on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:52:49 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:49:25 -0800
In-reply-to: <493DC7D3.70009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <493CB4BB.5090405@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <493DC7D3.70009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081105 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

0x44 wrote:

> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Rename Rule 5E1 (The Game of C Nomic) to "What is the name of this
>> nomic?".
>>   
> Why the hate for C Nomic references?

I don't hate them, I just don't believe in rule titles contradicting
rule texts.  Propose amending the text of 5E1 and I won't oppose you.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Fwd: Re: My favored refreshments]
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] RP voting results
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised yet again
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] My favored refreshments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread