Elliott Hird on Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:08:10 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal |
On 8 Dec 2008, at 11:06, Alex Smith wrote:
(The argument in Agora was about whether it was acceptable to deliberately violate such a rule; IMO, the intention of such rules is that accidental violations work but are illegal, and players who are abiding the rules shouldn't violate them deliberately).
I, along with comex, disagree, by the way, because as there is an in-game resolution mechanism, the criminal system, it is acceptable to violate SHALL NOTs if you believe you can take the punishment. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss