Warrigal on Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:39:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal |
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't get this "Players can do this, but it violates the rules" deal. I > mean, if the rules say you can't do it, doing it violates them, right? The > way I read your rule changes is like this: "Players can do this, but they > can't." If the rules say you cannot do it, doing it is impossible. If the rules say you shall not do it, doing it is punishable. (5E36, "Judgment": "If the Consultation's subject is on the matter of whether a Player has broken the Rules, and the Answer is Yes, then the Priest may assign a Punishment of either a Fine, specifying an amount of a Currency, or Jail, specifying a duration of ntime.") --Warrigal _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss