Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2

Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:02:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:02:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0812041812q5e7bd782kf3e57d3c527639c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49370BE1.9070506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49371D1A.2090705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49371E35.1010105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812040945k78ba75f3wd24030714302ce7b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812041812q5e7bd782kf3e57d3c527639c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This could earn J a Paradox trophy....
>
> Oh, and btw BP, the Oracle now has to select Priests at random. I didn't
> see
> any dice server requests.

There were only two definitely ordained players: j and codae. j was the
Supplicant.

If the other players were still ordained (which is not my reading of the
rule), then my assignments were indeed invalid...

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Emergency 1
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Confuse things further
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread