Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2

Jay Campbell on Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:14:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:14:11 -0800
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0812041812q5e7bd782kf3e57d3c527639c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <49370BE1.9070506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49371D1A.2090705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49371E35.1010105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650812040945k78ba75f3wd24030714302ce7b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812041812q5e7bd782kf3e57d3c527639c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

The assumed roll of a one-sided dice is 1.


> Oh, and btw BP, the Oracle now has to select Priests at random. I didn't see
> any dice server requests.
>
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
  - From: Sgeo
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
  - From: Elliott Hird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Regarding era-nomenclature controversies
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Confuse things further
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread