Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1

Elliott Hird on Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:30:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:30:24 +0000
In-reply-to: <49371631.3020309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <192031.15087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <493714F0.5020101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F99D11CF-A171-4E12-AFD4-6FD5D191D764@xxxxxxxxx> <49371631.3020309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 3 Dec 2008, at 23:28, Jay Campbell wrote:

> I don't see a clause that can be interpreted that way. Pointer?

All of them
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread