Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:27:18 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Ministry Shuffle!


Hmmm I don't want Society anymore for a while, I think (I'll hang on till
the end of the emergency).  Same for mad science, I'll gladly let ehird have
that back. Time = gone if we enter 5th era. That leaves Fauna, which I would
be quite alright with keeping if no one else wants it. If someone does, I'm
alright with relinquishing it too.

I'd be essentially interested in one moderate-to-large-sized ministry plus
possibly one small one (e.g. fauna) if necessary. I thnk the former would be
either Meta (if j wants it, sure, he can have it), Change, or Questions.

BP

PS: I think I will continue to maintain the Minstry of Time as I find to to
be a very useful resource, independetly of any claimed future actions by
individual players (or whether these are possible). Just because it keeps
track of the order in which gamestate changes happen, I visit it every
single nweek as Minster of Society to see how I should make the changes for
the nweek transition.

BP

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I thought I'd start getting input on which ministries people are interested
> in after this emergency resolves.
>
> If we enter the fifth era, the available ministries will be: Meta, Law,
> Change, Society, Questions, Grid, Fauna, and Mad Science. Otherwise, we
> will
> keep whatever we have now.
>
> You can do this a few ways:
> 1. Specify specific ministries that you want (or do not want). If only one
> player wants a ministry, they will get it. If more want it, we can use the
> fifth era's election/bidding procedure.
> 2. Specify a number of ministries you want. They will be assigned via the
> dice server from those not specifically requested.
> 3. A hybrid of the first two (e.g. "Law and one other ministry")
>
> I would like Business (if it still exists, if not I plan to re-propose it)
> and two others (hopefully not Law and Change; that would negate the intent
> of the shuffle).
>
> --
> Charles Schaefer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss