Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:27:18 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Ministry Shuffle! |
Hmmm I don't want Society anymore for a while, I think (I'll hang on till the end of the emergency). Same for mad science, I'll gladly let ehird have that back. Time = gone if we enter 5th era. That leaves Fauna, which I would be quite alright with keeping if no one else wants it. If someone does, I'm alright with relinquishing it too. I'd be essentially interested in one moderate-to-large-sized ministry plus possibly one small one (e.g. fauna) if necessary. I thnk the former would be either Meta (if j wants it, sure, he can have it), Change, or Questions. BP PS: I think I will continue to maintain the Minstry of Time as I find to to be a very useful resource, independetly of any claimed future actions by individual players (or whether these are possible). Just because it keeps track of the order in which gamestate changes happen, I visit it every single nweek as Minster of Society to see how I should make the changes for the nweek transition. BP On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > I thought I'd start getting input on which ministries people are interested > in after this emergency resolves. > > If we enter the fifth era, the available ministries will be: Meta, Law, > Change, Society, Questions, Grid, Fauna, and Mad Science. Otherwise, we > will > keep whatever we have now. > > You can do this a few ways: > 1. Specify specific ministries that you want (or do not want). If only one > player wants a ministry, they will get it. If more want it, we can use the > fifth era's election/bidding procedure. > 2. Specify a number of ministries you want. They will be assigned via the > dice server from those not specifically requested. > 3. A hybrid of the first two (e.g. "Law and one other ministry") > > I would like Business (if it still exists, if not I plan to re-propose it) > and two others (hopefully not Law and Change; that would negate the intent > of the shuffle). > > -- > Charles Schaefer > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss