Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot

["Elliott Hird" <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 27/11/2008, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/11/26, Elliott Hird penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>>
>> > Really, I like all three of them, it's just that yours and J's are
>> > a little
>> > more extreme than necessary and I think if we vote for Murphy's
>> > (which,
>> > according to current trends, we will not) then the next round of
>> > RPs will
>> > yeild something a bit more conservative (at least from me).
>>
>> I really don't get where this came from; mine is not extreme...
>
>
> I consider the concept of replacing ALL the rules (even if some of them are
> reenacted with similar wording) a little extreme. The renumbering part sure
> is. Also, the whole Grid thing is new (I kind of like it, but I would rather
> have things like this made into traditional proposals). (Yes, I know we had
> one in the first era, but it's new to me)
>

Replacing all the rules is just convenient. Most are unchanged.
> While we're on the subject, did you intentionally remove contracts or was
> that just an oversight? When your RP wins I intend to bring them back.
>

Gameplay that is both generic and unattached to the nomic system is broken.
> --
> Charles Schaefer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss