Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot

Sgeo on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:18:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
From: Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:18:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <7db5cba20811261447l1a515b09nec96ad736d9d2cfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <492C978C.2000506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0811251751y2f821517l839ce68f77729289@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20811251801o1bfaae10qb29387bf2cbd69e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0811251808i5ffefc14yd97bcd053c3f21a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492CB003.4010104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492CB0D8.4070304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DC6B120FC56E624FB73CF444630BAB46506657@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <492D645C.5040701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840811261228q658ac366ie246045d1ce83d6a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20811261447l1a515b09nec96ad736d9d2cfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I vote for ehird's Refresh Proposal.
>
> --Warrigal "Truthfulness is Optional"

I'd say that due to the signature, you wouldn't be violating Agoran
because you obviously don't actually intend to mislead.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paranoid
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread