Craig Daniel on Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:31:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Make it Better |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I submit a Refresh Proposal, titled "Make it Better", with the body > being > located at http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Ehird/ > Make_it_Better&oldid=8963&action=raw For the record: while this is primarily ehird's work, I've looked over it and given him a fair bit of input. As I see it, the major, apocalyptic bugs right now mostly result from the attempt to define every characteristic an object can have in terms of range and scope combined with random stupid mistakes. As I see it the biggest two are these: First, why the hell do we apply a Repealed property to rules rather than destroying them? That would work if there weren't things that refer to "if the rules allow" or some such and don't specify *active* rules. Second, We accidentally repealed all ministries. Whoops. This fixes both of those, and all the other major crises currently in effect. Urgent, but not game-breaking, is the stupid Outsider/External Force language (which I believe is unambiguous, but it's sure as hell confusing). Again, ehird's refresh fixes that one. Everything else is either a less urgent but useful minor upgrade or the big things from the addition of gameplay. These don't seem to me like they *have* to be part of a refresh, and I was thinking of submitting my own refresh proposal that excluded those and submitting proposals in case people didn't want to be doing such big changes using emergencies. However, we're almost out of time to get them in, and during said time I'm going to need to eat dinner and whatnot - so this is not the time for me to be going through the final version and editing it. Ergo, I encourage anyone who wants to keep the little things as they are for now to vote for this to get the fixes through, then undo the little changes by proposal if you don't like them. Or, better yet, replace them with things that maintain the upgrade but do it better; I have some thoughts in that particular direction myself, but it didn't seem like the place to be spending Emergency time. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss