Jay Campbell on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:16:10 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Priestly decisions |
I did the priest rolls but haven't officially assigned these out yet, there's 8 pages of paperwork to fill out. I'll accept any of these Answers that come in though. Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> 144: Yes. teucer identified em as "an internet friend who I talked >> into it"; in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I trust em. >> >> 147: Yes. Neither "The Operantly Conditioned Beast" nor any variation >> thereof is the Beast's name. Oracularity: Amend Rule 4E7 by appending, >> after "an Outsider and a Player", the text "(whose name is Fred)". >> > > > Wait. What was the question for 147. Is there a record somewhere of the > questions for 144-151? Can't seem to find them. > > BP > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss