Jay Campbell on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:16:10 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Priestly decisions


I did the priest rolls but haven't officially assigned these out yet, 
there's 8 pages of paperwork to fill out.

I'll accept any of these Answers that come in though.


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> 144:  Yes.  teucer identified em as "an internet friend who I talked
>> into it"; in the absence of evidence to the contrary, I trust em.
>>
>> 147:  Yes.  Neither "The Operantly Conditioned Beast" nor any variation
>> thereof is the Beast's name.  Oracularity:  Amend Rule 4E7 by appending,
>> after "an Outsider and a Player", the text "(whose name is Fred)".
>>     
>
>
> Wait. What was the question for 147. Is there a record somewhere of the
> questions for 144-151? Can't seem to find them.
>
> BP
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss