Re: [s-d] [s-b] SafeCorp

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ed Murphy wrote:
> j wrote:
>
>   
>> Jay Campbell wrote:
>>     
>>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> j wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> For every set of possible text up to 100 megabytes blah blah blah I 
>>>>> cause the Plain Text to be posted to the Public Form and for every set 
>>>>> of possible actions made apparent I intend to cause the Beast to perform 
>>>>> them.
>>>>>     
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> This may well be too ambiguous to be ineffective because it doesn't
>>>> specify the order in which you perform the actions.
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Why, in the order they are made apparent, of course.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Though any objection to one of these actions would need to specify 
>> exactly what sentence was being objected to.
>>     
>
> The hell it would.  I object to all attempts or intents to act
> that have arisen due to any contract named SafeCorp.
>
> _

"One of". Why object anyway?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss