Christopher Specker on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:55:57 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Automatic actions? |
Taral wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Christopher Specker > <painstricken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Question: Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an >> officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to >> perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action >> performed as if the Player had sent it to the public forum? >> > > Your question is as bad as the rule. What Player? > > copy/paste is evil. The question should read: Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action performed as if Party A had sent it to the public forum? _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss