Christopher Specker on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:55:57 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Automatic actions?


Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Christopher Specker
> <painstricken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Question:  Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an
>> officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to
>> perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action
>> performed as if the Player had sent it to the public forum?
>>     
>
> Your question is as bad as the rule. What Player?
>
>   
copy/paste is evil.

The question should read:

Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an
officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to
perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action
performed as if Party A had sent it to the public forum?



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss