Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak

Craig Daniel on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:55:26 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:55:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <285c99840811131354l77f9849exfb4bab97b5c037a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240811130817o1b87499ah17699ecf11492226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491C5874.80009@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650811130933j55ab3c01md4113e46556d9e8a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20811131257y6edbed4fk19804afc80dc2855@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840811131354l77f9849exfb4bab97b5c037a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/11/13, Warrigal ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx:
>>
>>
>> Being a copycat, I Challenge every Public Display regarding the Rules
>> on the B Nomic wiki.
>
>
> I address your challenge by stating that I believe the PD which I
> maintain is accurate.

I believe it to be inaccurate due to its failure to include the
results of a half-millennium-old consultation which contained an
oracularity fixing wooble's PD loophole.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] The Responsibility in Government Spending Act
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] The Responsibility in Government Spending Act
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] The Responsibility in Government Spending Act
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread