Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139

0x44 on Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:42:21 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:42:06 -0600
In-reply-to: <55b258c20811071923r1d349c4dn78a3cea921d14bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4914E2BF.6020800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4914F21A.5050405@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4914FC90.2020304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20811071923r1d349c4dn78a3cea921d14bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Craig Daniel wrote:
> I, however, can. I declare the answer to Consultation 139 CONSISTENT,
> though I would like to pass a proposal to replace the deleted text
> with something.
>   
I think a proposal defining Currency Game Objects and restoring that 
clause would probably work.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 139
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread