Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list

Charles Schaefer on Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:38:48 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:38:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <453192E0-302C-46BA-B392-8851057D43C8@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1226005440.10640.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <491366FD.30905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1226008589.10640.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <453192E0-302C-46BA-B392-8851057D43C8@xxxxxxxxx>

This seems a little bit like an abuse of this procedure to me (tidiness was
intended to correct errors of grammar, not substantive problems with a
rule). I don't see why we couldn't put this through the proposal process.

I'm not objecting, I just wanted to mention that.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
  - From: Alex Smith

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions actions
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tidiniess list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread