Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fine, since you've broken up my monopoly...

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I could check later but I'm pretty sure the uncertainty is easily resolved
by the rule on rule precedence. It also includes a section on temporal
precedence. I know proposals pass at the end of nday 12, the precedence rule
is only necessary if consultations are pondered at the end of an nday rather
than at the start of the next one.

BP

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Proposal 505 (Trust-busting) passed, creating five socks in Baby Blue corp,
> if it had less than five.
>
> At the same time, Consultation 130 became pondered, creating nine more Baby
> Blue socks.
>
> Which action happened first?
>
> Note: Consultation 130 did not mention what happened to Brick Red corp's
> socks. However, I am going to assume the same thing happened as in Baby
> Blue
> corp: Ty-Guy6's Brick Red sock ceased to exist. (and Prop 505 just created
> five more)
>
> BP, this means that your first five sock buying transactions in Brick Red
> happened, and either your first nine (if C130's oracularity is first) or
> all
> ten (if p505 is first) of the Baby Blue transactions happened.
>
> I submit the following transaction:
> COMMENCE TRANSACTION
> Assertion: There are four Baby Blue socks in possession of the Baby
> Blue laundry corporation.
> Action: I purchase those four socks.
> TRANSACTION COMPLETE
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss