Re: [s-d] [s-b] Punishments for Indictments 13, 14

Charles Schaefer on Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:57:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Punishments for Indictments 13, 14

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Punishments for Indictments 13, 14
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:56:27 -0700
In-reply-to: <901223.47433.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <901223.47433.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/10/18, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Charles is Guilty of mildly spamming spoon-business.  His Punishment is a
> fine of m50.


I would argue that a maximum punishment is a bit harsh, but this is my
second offense so I should probably have known better.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're going to keep taking game actions through the emergency...
Next by Date: [s-d] On the number of Game Objects
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're going to keep taking game actions through the emergency...
Next by thread: [s-d] On the number of Game Objects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread