Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.

Craig Daniel on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:18:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:18:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <48F74D18.4090209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F734E0.5040909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810160710u1a532f55v12b4e6452c051a04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F74D18.4090209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:18 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Craig Daniel wrote:
>> I dispute these assertions.
> Fine, I'll revise without the commentary text.

Sounds good to me.

I wouldn't want to have weird-ass consultations about whether it
affected the success of the RP.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread