Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)

Charles Schaefer on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:49:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:48:58 -0700
In-reply-to: <48F4D434.9020203@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F4D434.9020203@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This was sent to business. What is it? A proposal? A contract? An intent,
pending objection? A mistake?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)
  - From: ais523
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Where precedents may differ / FREE MACKS
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Internomic II (rough draft)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread