Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's try that again while we still can

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

teucer wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Being bound by a Contract's text and being obligated to take actions on
>> behalf of a Corporation are two different things.
> 
> Being bound by a contract's text is not explicitly defined in the
> ruleset, but based on the word's meaning we know it to be the state of
> being able to be compelled by the text of the contract to take or
> refrain from taking actions depending on the text of the contract.

This is a reasonable interpretation (though obviously not the one
I am currently favoring).

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss