Jay Campbell on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:43:49 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou |
Charles Schaefer wrote: > 2008/10/13, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Charles Schaefer wrote: >> >>> This isn't even a legal corporation. >>> >>> "2. ehird is an Officer of *ehird's Corporation*." (emphasis added) >>> >>> The contract specifies the name of the corporation as A GREAT THING >>> CORPORATION. No Officers exist for this corporation, and thus it is not >>> valid. >>> >>> >> While we're at it, there's no such thing as "members" "joining" a >> contract. Come to think of it, none of these Contracts have "parties," >> technically, causing all but the Sock corporations to cease to exist. >> > > > The submitter of a contract is automatically a party. > "Upon doing so that legal entity becomes bound by that Contract." That doesn't make you a party. B has no definition for party, so we have to go by the dictionary: "A social gathering especially for pleasure or amusement: a cocktail party." _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss