Re: [s-d] [s-b] Must a contract be meaningful to be valid?

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There is no claim this document forms a corporation, so there are fewer 
challenges than last time.

But, teucer, you are bound by this contract until such time as you prove 
it contains a provision to allow you to cease to be bound by it. Nor may 
you edit the contract. It is not a corporation, so you are not able to 
act on behalf of it.

My guess is this is some pre-20th century cipher that when unwound with 
the appropriate key (or maybe just an algorithm) says "teucer may leave 
this contract".


Craig Daniel wrote:
> As a follow-up to explorations with Epimenides, I submit the following
> contract, entitled "lhret rhlhr":
>
> {lhret rhlhr wjehl lryaj klher awjhye lewlj kralk jsaer yhkjl rebgl
> aeryl ghkao iusdo ixzjd ewlho izgei ogqoi ugewo iagok dsabj vbiua
> euiog uaoig jeaug utoai gxugi bxjah gegoy uioqi wqpre}
>
>  - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss