Re: [s-d] [s-b] Transactions

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:24 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:20 AM, ehird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > It's aligned wrongly.
>
> No it's not.  The } is exactly the same distance from the two {s, so
> the two transaction blocks are the same size and end at the same
> point.  (The intent of course is that they happen at the same time, so
> I simultaneously join B Nomic, forfeit C Nomic (due to Rule 4E83),
> forfeit B Nomic, and join C Nomic.)


Here's the deal, though. If read as one transaction, this fails (see my
oracularity on the matter). If read as two separate transactions, your
attempt to forfeit succeeds (nothing can keep you from doing it) in both
nomics (Rule 4E83) but your attempt to join fails in both nomics, since
you're already a Player.

So unless it's one big transaction, you're out :-(
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss