Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecu

comex on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:06:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:05:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <55b258c20810100759m259093e8wfe5e67bdaa447bdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840810092241u14585d05kceefecc3fe11dce8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810100750t5105138n6bffccef3cf9c8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810100759m259093e8wfe5e67bdaa447bdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Clever idea, though, Charles; I skimmed your spam to see if I could
> find the scam, but managed to overlook it.

I found it quite easily by searching for "intend" (and might have
found it even more easily by searching for 'objection'), although when
I tried something like this on Agora I intentionally broke up the text
so that, while its meaning was (theoretically) clear if read by a
human, it would be difficult to search for.  -- But I'm curious if it
works, because in Agora, the precedent is that messages hidden within
spam are ineffective.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Brick Red/Baby Blue Dividends
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] This is misdemeanor spam. I will plead guilty if prosecuted.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread