Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thank you for the list, it will probably be a good reference if C
> is determined to exist in a generally object-less state, but as MoQ I'm not
> going to file those Consultations. Too many, and anyway, we already have
> one
> pending to determine the general state of C. I think BP is the current
> priest of that one.


Yep. And I've got a fairly long bit of reasoning written out so far, but now
I think I might have to revise much of it. I'm still not sure which way it
will go. But it will be accompanied by an Oracularity. Which I *think* will
make a lot of the C/B tomfoolery that has happened recently void. But
probably not as much of it as I initially thought...

Might get that answer written tonight, hopefully tomorrow at the latest.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss