Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: C Wooble

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am considering this Consultation carefully. If anyone would like to try
their luck at resolving the problems of C/B Nomic, let me know ASAP. I
assume that since Billy Pilgrim took the ordained property again he is
nominating himself.

I'm considering Zotting this Consultation on the basis that in B Nomic
there exist no C Nomic Players. But I hesitate because I want this matter
resolved. Does anyone care to submit a Consultation, carefully worded, that
strikes more to the heart of the matter?

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I submit this Consultation:
>
> Question: Does C Nomic player Wooble have points?
>
> Unbeliever: J
>
> Reasoning: Although changes to B Nomic cause simultaneous changes to C
> Nomic per 4E83, the initial gamestate of C Nomic was not necessarily a
> copy of the current B Nomic state.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss