| Jamie Dallaire on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:56:20 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] spoonerism |
ohhh. I dunno, I think that sounds relatively unambiguous. Oh I see the typo now. nme. Still... Hmmm... so.... the operational definition of "unambiguous" IS pretty ambiguous.... On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:52 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:45 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> I don't see the nme property in the ruleset. > >> > > > > > > This is true. Yet the only way of becoming a Player specified in the > ruleset > > is to request to be a player AND give a desired player name. > > > > But perhaps we should fix that property thing.. > He didn't specify a desired player name, instead he gave his desired > nme. I'm not sure what that is, though, I don't see it in the ruleset. > > > -- > -- > 0x44; > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss