Re: [s-d] Now that murder has been repealed...

["Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thing is the rule
>> does not say WHOSE macks the felon can destroy, ergo he is obligated and
>> able to destroy whatever macks he wants up to the amount of the fine.
>
> I don't see where you'd get that "able" from anywhere in the rules,
> and Rule 4E2 would seem to explicitly make it impossible to destroy
> something unless another rule allows it.  No rule I can see authorizes
> anyone to destroy mackerel, and Rule 4E73 was probably influenced by
> Agora's rules that actually allow the destruction of currency.  In any
> event, 4E54 and 4E73 conflict; 4E54 says mackerel is deducted for a
> fine, while 4E73 creates an obligation that's impossible to fulfill.

Err, I could try actually reading 4E73 completely.  You're right, it
does make you able.  However, whether this means your own macks are
deducted by 4E54 immediately and then you're obligated to destroy the
amount of macks you were fined is ambiguous.



-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss