Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:14:00 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:13:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <285c99840806292323h7ee7e2b7s6820408961fab761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4862809E.40602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0806251040w59a75e1ak881a6a21301b404f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1de9d4fc0806272317t6991f510n955acec1b706a74e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840806272334w6aa7c1a4ybb64651da6b11fe4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4865DD42.7090404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650806280657r543fbe6dr4f70df77c9b6c924@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840806292323h7ee7e2b7s6820408961fab761@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> 2008/6/28, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > I'm up for marching on too. I'm planning to draft a slew of proposals for
> > simplifying the ruleset. etc. etc.
>
>
> A significant reduction in the ruleset might be a good justification for
> starting a new era.

Agreed.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: David E. Smith
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Remove Field Matches
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Win!
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread