Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

ihope on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:08:12 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:08:03 -0400
In-reply-to: <285c99840806290005q20246843n7bbedbeb37929371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4862809E.40602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0806251040w59a75e1ak881a6a21301b404f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1de9d4fc0806272317t6991f510n955acec1b706a74e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840806272334w6aa7c1a4ybb64651da6b11fe4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0806280817o5aa357b0k5f36a7ea77e37319@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840806290005q20246843n7bbedbeb37929371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As much as I hate to even mention this point: what if we run out of letters?

Then we switch to Roman numerals, of course. I, II, III, IV, V, . . .,
CXXVII, . . ., MMMCMXCIX. I don't think we'll hit the 3999th Roman
incarnation any time soon.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: David E. Smith
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread