Re: [s-d] [s-b] OCB LLC

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't think I'll support or object either way. I'm just suggesting that it
might be an improvement in wording to include that. Also, what happens if
there are multiple bribes? (especially if some of them conflict)

2008/6/6, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> That was the intention. If that language would cause you to support it
> I'll resubmit.
>
> Charles Schaefer wrote:
> > Is he obligated to fulfill the bribe?
> >
> > 2008/6/6, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> With support and without objection I amend the Corporation OCB LLC with:
> >>
> >> {
> >>
> >> WHEREAS The Operantly Conditioned Beast is of meager means yet posesses
> >> a multitude of TALENTS able to support his basic needs,
> >>
> >> Any player may transfer 50 Macks to OCB LLC and Bribe The Beast to
> >> perform a specified Trick or to use a Device in a specified manner.
> >>
> >> }
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss