Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 119

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, this section of the Resoning ended up being discarded at the end, so...

Codae



----- Original Message ----
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 7:02:29 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 119

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Justin Ahmann
<quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Modifying a Contract through use of another Contract is not governed by the Rules, and thus is impossible.  Pancake would be unable to update itself to reflect the changes, but the Contract says that it does update itself to reflect the changes.  I would have to answer this Consultation PARADOX, as there is no mechanism for resolving factual conflicts between Rules and other Game Documents.
>
This is flawed logic. Rule 4e70 permits contracts to be modified as
their text allows. The text of panacake allows other articles of
pancake to modify it.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss